Explore Telescopes
- 3,721
- 4
- Customize
- All Rankings
All The Best Double Fork Telescopes
Welcome to the Telescope Piki, the best place to decide between telescopes. Telescopes allow humans to view objects at great distances through the use of electromagnetic energy. This Piki makes use of more than 3,700 facts about 4 telescopes. Sort and filter these telescopes according to your preferences using the options on the left. Whether you're looking for telescopes with a high maximum useful magnification, telescopes under $1,500 or something else entirely, we have you covered.
You are currently viewing the best double fork telescopes. These telescopes all have a double fork.
Select Criteria
Reset Preferences
Recent Activity on Telescopes
-
pikimal created the Bushnell 789971 Telescope 04/01 at 2:26 PM (EDT)
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
alaina
edited the Telescope Piki
03/01 at 10:35 AM (EST)
-
-
Independent, Unbiased, Fact-Based Rankings
Selected Preferences Mount Type: Double Fork (Double Fork: Required) Overall: Best
Meade LX200-ACF 10 10mm Telescope
The Meade LX200-ACF 10 10mm Telescope is moderately priced. It has a maximum useful magnification of 600 x, an optical diameter of 203 millimeters and an optical finderscope. It has a double fork mount and an altazimuth mount.
-
Price: $1,199
Given that users looking for Best Double Fork Telescopes prefer lower values for price, the Meade LX200-ACF 10 10mm Telescope achieves 96% performance in this category.
-
Vision Quality: Maximum Useful Magnification - 600 x, Optical Diameter - 203 mm, Focal Length - 2000 mm
The Meade LX200-ACF 10 10mm Telescope achieves 73% performance for vision quality.
-
Composite Score
We currently have no data on the Meade LX200-ACF 10 10mm Telescope for composite score.
Meade LX200R Telescope
The Meade LX200R Telescope is very expensive. It has a maximum useful magnification of 600 x, an optical diameter of 203 millimeters and an optical finderscope. It has a double fork mount and an altazimuth mount.
-
Price: $2,799
Given that users looking for Best Double Fork Telescopes prefer lower values for price, the Meade LX200R Telescope achieves 92% performance in this category.
-
Vision Quality: Maximum Useful Magnification - 600 x, Optical Diameter - 203 mm, Focal Length - 2000 mm
The Meade LX200R Telescope achieves 73% performance for vision quality.
-
Composite Score: 100
The Meade LX200R Telescope achieves 100% performance for composite score. However, the current preferences ignore composite score in computing the rankings.
Meade ETX-80AT-TC Telescope
The Meade ETX-80AT-TC Telescope is inexpensive. It has a maximum useful magnification of 270 x, an optical diameter of 80 millimeters and an optical finderscope. It has a double fork mount and an altazimuth mount.
-
Price: $269.95
Given that users looking for Best Double Fork Telescopes prefer lower values for price, the Meade ETX-80AT-TC Telescope achieves 99% performance in this category.
-
Vision Quality: Maximum Useful Magnification - 270 x, Optical Diameter - 80 mm, Focal Length - 400 mm
The Meade ETX-80AT-TC Telescope achieves 32% performance for vision quality.
-
Composite Score: 80
The Meade ETX-80AT-TC Telescope achieves 75% performance for composite score. However, the current preferences ignore composite score in computing the rankings.
Celestron CPC 1100 GPS(XLT) Telescope
The Celestron CPC 1100 GPS(XLT) Telescope is very expensive. It has a maximum useful magnification of 70 x, an optical diameter of 280 millimeters and an optical finderscope. It has a double fork mount, and the Celestron CPC 1100 GPS(XLT) Telescope is motorized.
-
Price: $2,999
Given that users looking for Best Double Fork Telescopes prefer lower values for price, the Celestron CPC 1100 GPS(XLT) Telescope achieves 91% performance in this category.
-
Vision Quality: Maximum Useful Magnification - 70 x, Optical Diameter - 280 mm, Focal Length - 2800 mm
The Celestron CPC 1100 GPS(XLT) Telescope achieves 8% performance for vision quality.
-
Composite Score: 100
The Celestron CPC 1100 GPS(XLT) Telescope achieves 100% performance for composite score. However, the current preferences ignore composite score in computing the rankings.